Three Order Types. Every Tristar File.
Arizona workers' comp litigation rewards the attorney who knows the file completely on day one and keeps it current every day after. ArcuityVizion delivers file mastery at litigation onset, continuous currency, and attorney-first IME control — on every Tristar assignment.
The 15-Second Version
Three order types. One continuous advantage. On every Tristar file you handle.
New File Prep
When a Tristar claim becomes newly litigated, our system reads every document already on the claim — every page, no sampling — before the file is sent to your firm.
Record Retrieval
As new records come in — subpoenaed, requested, delivered — each one is read and analyzed the day it arrives, and every prior work product is refreshed automatically.
IME Review Prep
When the case goes to an IME, the physician's package arrives with an Arizona-rigorous analytical backdrop — you review and edit first, then release to the doctor.
You open the file on day one knowing it the way you'd normally know it after a year — it stays current on its own — and the IME goes out already aligned with your theory of the case.
What Lands on Your Desk
Six structured deliverables — present from day one, updated automatically as the file grows.
Claim Summary & Chronology
Parties, mechanism, treatment arc, disputed issues — your five-minute brief before the first client call. Every medical event, dated and page-cited.
Inconsistency Report & Causation Matrix
Every place the claimant's statements and the records disagree, page-cited. Competing causes tested and scored, ready for your theory of the case — including the prior-condition ledger with negations separated from real complaints.
Arizona's Procedural Clock Is Brutal — We Make You Ready on Day One
The Deadline Structure
IME notice: 15 days. Protective-order motion: 3 days after notice. Response: 3 days after motion. IME report must be produced immediately on receipt.
These windows assume you already know the file. Most firms don't — associates are still page-turning at day 3 while opposing counsel is drafting the Miceli motion.
File Mastery at Every Deadline
New File Prep hands you file mastery at litigation onset. Record Retrieval keeps every work product current the day new documents land. IME Review Prep gives you the analytical backdrop before the physician sees it.
On day 3 you file the Miceli-defeating opposition with specialty justification, geography record, and non-cumulativeness proof already documented. Nobody else can hit that clock cold.
Arizona ALJs Reward the Better-Founded Opinion
Arizona ALJs resolve conflicting medical evidence by adopting whichever opinion is better-founded and better-reasoned — not the louder one, not the more credentialed one. The one that walks through chronology, records, objective findings, and alternative causes wins.
The Desert Insulations Doctrine
An opinion built on an incomplete or inaccurate history has little probative value. That is the Arizona defense weapon — and it only works if you can prove what the opposing expert never saw.
The Structured Evidence Graph
Not a summary — every condition, date, negation, and contradiction across the entire record, coded and cross-referenced. Every assertion carries a {document, page, span} address — impeachment-ready by construction.
Both Directions, Same Data
Your defense IME writes a report the ALJ can adopt. Your cross-examination hits the exact gaps the claimant expert left open. We produce the countable, reproducible facts that make the ALJ pick you.
Attorney-First on Every IME
You Control the Analytical Backdrop
The Arizona analytical backdrop lands on your desk before the physician's. You control what the reviewing doctor sees framed, what stays in the raw record, and what emphasis the analysis carries into the exam.
Edit Freely Before Release
Add your theory of the case, remove what doesn't fit, sharpen what does. The physician receives a records package plus an attorney-approved analytical backdrop already anchored to §23-1044, §23-1065(C), Desert Insulations, and the pre-existing condition history — no re-teaching Arizona doctrine at the exam.
This question dies when the answer is a certified full review with pinpoint citations — a result that human review cannot credibly assert and that generic AI cannot document.
ArcuityVizion provides page-level provenance on every assertion, full-review-always commitment, and OCR-fidelity scoring — turning the impeachment question into a strength at deposition, objection, or ALJ hearing.
Capability Mapping: Arizona Law → ArcuityVizion
Each Arizona statutory requirement maps directly to a specific ArcuityVizion capability — delivering file mastery, continuous currency, and attorney-first IME control on every Tristar file.
Every Cross Module Arizona Rewards — Pre-Built From Our Data
Arizona defense wins are structural — the ALJ rewards specific, exhibit-backed attacks on the claimant expert's foundation. Our system produces the ammunition for every one.
Records Reviewed — Incomplete Foundation
Every record the opposing expert didn't cite, page-listed. Show the ALJ exactly what they never saw. (Desert Insulations)
Alternative Causes — Selective Analysis
Prior conditions and degenerative findings, dated and coded. Natural progression vs. aggravation: the before/after condition matrix arrives already built. (Mandex; Karber)
Certainty vs. Support — Overstatement
Objective-support tally behind every stated opinion. Show the ALJ where the claimant expert's confidence outran the record.
Internal Consistency — Contradictions
Every conflict between claimant statement, records, and imaging — page-cited. "Previously discovered" becomes provable to the page from the baseline ledger. (§23-1061(H))
Foundation Attack — Desert Insulations
The complete history — with proof they didn't have it. Every question can be proven from an exhibit, which is the Arizona ALJ standard of "better-founded" turned into a workflow.
Countable, Reproducible, Citable
Every data point carries a concept code, a confidence score, and a {document, page, span} address. These aren't impressions — they are source-anchored facts the witness cannot evade.
The Value Proposition
The File That Knows Itself Is the Product.
In Arizona workers' comp litigation, the defense attorney with year-one command on day one — and a file that stays current — is the attorney Tristar wants on the next assignment. ArcuityVizion makes that the default, not the exception.
⚡ Day One Mastery
First client report written from mastery, not skimming. First ALJ conference with disputed issues already mapped. First deposition outline anchored to page cites, not hope.
🔄 Every Day, Not Just Day One
New subpoena return at 4 p.m. Tuesday → integrated, cross-referenced, and reflected in every work product by Wednesday morning. No stale chronology. No missed inconsistency.
💰 The Money
§23-1065(C) apportionment flagged automatically. §23-941.01 settlement inventory delivered as a ready exhibit. Uncapped PI exposure under Ariz. Const. art. 2, §31 — record mastery is the posture Arizona rewards on both files.
📋 The Ask — Zero Cost to Your Firm
Tristar places the orders. One line in your acknowledgment letter: "Please order ArcuityVizion New File Prep, Record Retrieval, and IME Review Prep on this claim." The work product arrives with the assignment.
Humans fatigue, sample, and can't produce counts. Generic AI paraphrases probabilistically — no ontology grounding, no negation logic, no reproducibility, no span-level audit trail. ArcuityVizion produces evidence. Everything else produces prose.
ArcuityVizion for Arizona Defense Counsel